An Examination and Confirmation of
a Macro Theory of Conversations
through
A Realization of the Protologic Lp by Microscopic
Simulation
A thesis submitted for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
by
Paul A Pangaro
Department of Cybernetics, Brunel University
May 1987
[Notes: The following document constituted
the prose portion of the dissertation without modification or
updating, completed in 1987. The software portion, called THOUGHTSTICKER
and running on Symbolics systems, is described in detail; however
its software listing in LISP, which comprised a major element
of the dissertation effort, is omitted. The work was never intended
as a robust review of the related fields of AI and so forth;
they were included in a skeletal critique to satisfy the academic
requirements. Section III.3
to the end are the significant portions of the work. Unfortunately
the production task of including figures, especially considering
their tiny fonts, is cumbersome and they have not yet been added.
THOUGHTSTICKER is described in a less formal context in a
published account
of its origins and features, and a marketing
brochure.]
- Abstract
- Acknowledgments
I. Preface
- I.1 Structure of the Dissertation
- I.2 A Context for AI and Cybernetics
Terminologies
II. Background
III. Review
III.1 Knowledge-Based AI Systems
III.3.1 Semantic Nets
III.3.2 Frames
III.3.3 Expert Systems and
Rules
III.2 Related Work in Cybernetics
III.2.1 Foundations
III.2.2 Laing
III.2.3 Personal Construct
Theory
III.3 THOUGHTSTICKER and Computer-aided
Instruction
III.3.1 Intelligent"
Training
III.3.2 Background of the
Term "THOUGHTSTICKER"
III.3.3 Existing Applications
III.3.4 The User Experience
III.3.5 Comparison to Computer-Aided
Instruction
III.3.6 THOUGHTSTICKER's Training
"Knowledgebase"
III.3.7 Aids to Authoring
III.4 Related Software Systems
III.4.1 Database Management
Systems
III.4.2 "Thought Processors"
IV. Foundations of Conversation
Theory
V. Conversation Theory Software
V.1 The Birth of "THOUGHTSTICKER"
V.1.1 Raison d' THOUGHTSTICKER
V.1.2 Represent What?
V.1.3 Attempts at Knowledge
Representation: "Expert Systemf
V.2 The origins of THOUGHTSTICKER
V.2.1 The Demands of Course
Assembly
V.2.2 THOUGHTSTICKER Defined
V.2.3 THOUGHTSTICKER in its
current forms
V.2.4 Lp at the Macro Level
V.2.5 Uses of THOUGHTSTICKER
V.3 Making Statements
V.3.1 Models, Topics and Relations
V.3.2 Instating Entailments
V.3.3 Coherence
V.3.4 Subjectivity of Statements
V.4 Contradiction Checking
V.4.1 Cases of Contradiction
V.4.2 Resolution of Conflict
V.4.3 To Resolve
V.5 Analogy
V.5.1 The Form of Analogy
V.5.2 The Relation of Analogy
and Coherence
V.5.3 Analogy and Distributivity
V.5.6 Adding Coherent Relations:
Saturation
V.5.7 Tutorial Aids
V.5.8 Implications of THOUGHTSTICKER
V.5.9 Many Authors Conversing
V.5.10 Personalized Vocabularies
VI. The Essence of Process:
Micro Simulation of Lp
VI.1 Knowledge Representation
Display
VI.2 Displays in THOUGHTSTICKER
VI.2.1 Experimental Software
Facility
VI.2.2 Discussion of the Programming
VI.2.3 Coherence Displayed
VI.2.4 Animated Interpretations
of Topic Relations
VI.2.5 Pruning Displayed
VI.2.6 Contradiction Displayed
VI.3 Conflict Terminology:
Ambiguity and Contradiction
VI.4 The Activation of Analogy
versus Coherence
VI.5 "Forces" Model
VI.5.1 Movement toward Micro
Modelling
VI.5.2 Basic Force Calculations
VI.5.3 Linear and Squares
Result
VI.5.4 Prune Case
VI.6 Discussion of Results
VI.6.1 Basic Contradiction
Detection: Full Genoa
VI.6.2 Subset
VI.6.3 Ambiguous contradiction:
Partial Genoa
VII. Conclusions and Summary
VII.1 Lp Software at the
Macro Level
VII.2 Macro theory and Micro
confirmation
VII.3 Extensions to the Work
VII.3.1 Dimensional Control
VII.3.2 Cognitive Force Values
VII.3.3 Pruning and Resolution
VII.3.4 New Hardware
|