Studying past innovations may be useless, because the specifics that create one opportunity for innovation will never be repeated. A rigorous study of innovators (and their precursors, inventors) may be useful, because understanding human characteristics may guide the efforts of future innovators.
Understanding the relationship of language to innovation is key, because language determines what cannot be talked about, and therefore what cannot be achieved.
In this context, Paul Pangaro answers questions in two broad areas:
What is “Innovation” and how do we get it? The term is ubiquitous, its meaning diluted, and means to achieve it are muddled. Pangaro argues that innovation is an insight that enables change which creates value. Articulation and demonstration of the insight are prerequisites to adoption—to the realizing of potential contained in the insight. Obsession is required as a property of both the "inventor" (who originates the insight, through persistence to solve a problem) and the "innovator" (who foresees the value before it is realized, and persists in bringing about change). A detailed model of innovation is offered as a means to delineate phases and requirements, and to reveal how innovation can (and cannot) be fostered.
What is “Organizational Language” and what are its properties? The language of an organization is the means by which participants create models of their environment, frame the problems they hope to solve, and explain possible means for solving them. As such, Pangaro argues, language becomes the basis both by which an organization succeeds under current conditions, and is unable to see those conditions changing. Pangaro shows how language is both this blessing and curse, and outlines a solution against being trapped in present-day language. He suggests a means for organizations to judge an appropriate trade-off for allocating resources for developing new language versus implementing plans based on the current language. |